- Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
- Affirmative Recovery
- American Indian Law and Policy
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation
- Appellate Advocacy and Guidance
- Business Litigation
- Civil Rights and Police Misconduct
- Class Action Litigation
- Commercial/Project Finance and Real Estate
- Corporate Governance and Special Situations
- Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
- Domestic and International Arbitration
- Health Care Litigation
- Insurance and Catastrophic Loss
- Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation
- Mass Tort Attorneys
- Medical Malpractice Attorneys
- Personal Injury Attorneys
- Telecommunications Litigation and Arbitration
- Wealth Planning, Administration, and Disputes
Acumen Powered by Robins Kaplan LLP®
Ediscovery, Applied Science and Economics, and Litigation Support Solutions
-
June 1, 2022Chambers USA Recognizes Five Robins Kaplan Practice Groups And 17 Lawyers In 2022 Guide
-
June 1, 2022Seasoned Attorney Joins Firm’s Business Litigation Group
-
May 26, 2022Shira Shapiro Named Woman of Promise By The Pearl Society
-
June 3, 202219th Annual Advanced Insurance Law
-
June 9, 2022Building Your Brand: Perspectives and Insights from a Diverse Bar
-
June 10, 2022LGBTQ Legal Services: Transgender Name Change Clinic
-
May 24, 2022Briefly: Seeking Fees and Costs While on Appeal
-
May 19, 202211th Circ. Ban On Service Awards May Inhibit Class Actions
-
May 13, 2022Trademark Applications and the Murky Waters of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
-
June 2, 2022Sandberg Stepping Down as Meta COO After 14 Years
-
June 1, 2022Markets Revert to Recent Form as Pessimism Takes Hold
-
May 27, 2022Unexpectedly Strong Retail Sales Pull Markets Back from the Brink
Find additional firm contact information for press inquiries.
Find resources to help navigate legal and business complexities.
Leo F. Feeney
Leo F. Feeney
Partner
Confidential Settlement: In excess of $5 Million for death of 50-year-old married woman with no children.
Nipp v. Martin and ANC Rental Corporation and its subsidiary Alamo Rent-A-Car: $2.5 Million verdict for the wrongful death of elderly retired couple.
Steffenhagen v. Dairy Farmers of America aka Mid-America Dairymen, Inc.: A direct action by the employee against the employer on the theory that the employer’s conduct should lift the immunity generally given to employers in a direct action suit by the employee’s survivors, even though the Minnesota Workers Compensation Act strictly bars suits of this nature against the employer. Subsequent to oral arguments in the Minnesota Court of Appeals the matter was settled by the employer for an amount that remains confidential.
Plaintiff v. Alfa-Laval Agri, Inc.: Settlement, two-year-old child consumed liquid dairy pipeline cleaner from farm chemical container while in the family milk house with his mother. Notwithstanding alleged negligence of the mother in supervision of the child, and the fact that the matter was venued in a conservative rural jurisdiction, the manufacturers of the farm chemical and the hand pump attached to the chemical’s container agreed to pay close to a seven figure number for esophageal burn injuries caused by the toddler’s consumption of the toxic pipeline cleaner.
Sharp v. Case Corporation: $6.3 million verdict.
Rogers v. Olson Transport: $10,435,000 verdict.
Brault v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company: Established in a recently published appellate decision that insurance coverage purchased by liquor vendors is increased to the maximum amount available under the policy, i.e., the aggregate limit, when the policy does not specify the sublimit for each specific area of coverage.
- "Professional Excellence Award," from the Minnesota State Bar Association, awarded to a group of lawyers who represented survivors of the 35W Bridge Collapse on a pro bono basis (2009)
- Named a “Minnesota Super Lawyer,” Super Lawyers (2003-2007)
- Selected by peers and listed in The Best Lawyers in America (1995-2022 editions)
- Minnesota
- University of Minnesota Law School, LL.B. (1964)
- St. Thomas College, B.A.
RESOURCES
NEWS
If you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will not make this determination by e-mail communication. The telephone numbers and addresses for our offices are listed on this page. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.
By accepting these terms, you are confirming that you have read and understood this important notice.